中央二台的全球资讯榜刚刚播报了，阿壮自1999年开始服用兴奋剂－－“EPO”。而且已经有6份尿样得到证实了，法国“队报”开始介入进行调查了！
虽然我们无法得到确认，但是有两种可能：
1，阿壮确实服用了“EPO”，不过其它的选手也不见得不服用哦，世界一流运动员已经很多人被查处服用“EPO”了。
2，典型的树大招风，因为他获得的环法冠军太多了
至于结果可能还要漫长的去证实喽！！！
“EPO”是一种新的兴奋剂，可以提高运动员30％的耐力。在前几年因为没有科技手段检测出来人体是否服用，随着科技发展现在可以检测出来了。
这个星期的roadbikerider news letter标题为Armstrong Accused
L'Equipe: "The Armstrong Lie"
Yes, the French believe they finally have proof after years of suspicions and accusations that Lance Armstrong has used performance-enhancing drugs to win the Tour de France. The newspaper L'Equipe just published a lengthy investigative report detailing new evidence that Armstrong illegally used EPO in 1999 during his first of seven consecutive Tour victories.
Under the banner headline "The Armstrong Lie," L'Equipe reported that six Armstrong urine samples from the '99 Tour were found to have "characteristic, undeniable" signs of EPO, based on a testing method that had not been devised at the time of that race. The test was conducted on the B (backup) samples, which were frozen six years ago.
As when previously accused, Armstrong is denying the use of EPO (erythropoietin, which improves endurance by increasing oxygen-carrying red blood cells) or any other banned substance.
"Yet again, a European newspaper has reported that I have tested positive for performance enhancing drugs," he said in a published statement. "Unfortunately, the witch hunt continues and the article is nothing short of tabloid journalism. I will simply restate what I have said many times: I have never taken performance enhancing drugs."
According to cyclingnews.com, the recent analysis of 1999 samples was done to validate the current EPO testing method, which has come under fire for false positives. One part of the research involved proofing the EPO test against a sample group that had possibly used the drug without needing to hide it. No test for EPO was used in the '99 Tour. In fact, no test for athletes was approved until the Sydney Olympics in 2000.
The retrospective testing was done on all of the '99 Tour's B samples. According to L'Equipe, 12 samples were positive for EPO and six of those belonged to Armstrong.
Jean-Marie Leblanc, the Tour director, praised L'Equipe's report as "very complete, very professional, very meticulous." He termed the evidence against Armstrong "compelling." But he added that disciplinary action against Armstrong is unlikely. The A samples were not preserved so there can be no second test to confirm B sample results. Even L'Equipe admits, "It cannot be regarded as a positive test in the strict regulatory sense."
Dick Pound, head of the World Anti-Doping Agency, told the Italian newspaper Gazzetta dello Sport, "It will be interesting to see what the UCI [International Cycling Union] and the American cycling federation will do and what Lance Armstrong has to say. If the tests are credible, Armstrong is obliged to give explanations, above all because he has always denied taking doping substances. If something is revealed, we can't do anything because [WADA] didn't exist in 1999. It is, however, important that the truth be established."
LeBlanc said it would take a decision from the UCI for Armstrong's 1999 victory to be downgraded. "We are very unsettled and shocked by the revelations in L'Equipe," he said when the news broke. "We must wait for the answer from Lance Armstrong, his doctors and advisers before making judgments. But indisputably I feel disconcerted and disappointed like many other sports people."
Yesterday LeBlanc sounded convinced Armstrong is guilty, telling the Associated Press, "For the first time -- and these are no longer rumors, or insinuations, these are proven scientific facts -- someone has shown me that in 1999, Armstrong had a banned substance called EPO in his body."
In Armstrong's defense, some experts have come forward to dispute the validity of any drug test on urine samples that have been frozen for six years. The fact that none of the other six supposed EPO users from the '99 Tour has been named by L'Equipe supports the "witch hunt" accusation against the paper.
To keep up with these fast-breaking developments so critical to Lance's legacy, here are two reputable online news sources: http://www.cyclingnews.com and http://www.velonews.com
但愿这不是真的,但愿这是一场误会, 期盼水落石出的那一天的到来. 阿壮我相信你是用真正的势力换取的冠军,就算是真的阿壮也永远还是我的偶像.
查出来是兴奋剂，查不出来是高科技。
高科技手段，相信所以的环法选手都采用过。
1999年的B瓶尿样查出EPO阳性，只能说明现在的检测技术更先进了。仅此而已，有谁还能回到1999年吗？
相信法国人说的是真的，但是于事无补，
可能的结果就是，在已经树立的丰碑上，贴个标记，说这里曾经破损过。
貌似不是真的，
EPO是促红细胞生成素，治疗癌症的时候会使用到，用于大剂量放疗化疗的造血支持。 99年阿姆斯特朗只是癌症初愈，在他身上有EPO很正常。 不过当时的药检水平检测不出来后期使用EPO和人身本身EPO的区别，所以当时没有发生异议。 前不久刚刚才有能将后期注射EPO和人身本身EPO区分开的方法。 所以无聊（或者说是居心叵测）的法国科研人员就拿阿姆斯特朗的尿样下手了，然后如愿了。
别地方看来地!~~~有点道理也嘿嘿
我相信今年参加环法的所有自行车选手都吃过了各种各样的药物
希望是假的!
[em03]从news letter中的内容来看，主要就是集中在99年的那次，法国人找到了新的证据证明阿壮服用epo，而他坚决否认服用了任何提高运动能力的兴奋剂或者是禁药。
UCI现在要作出决定，是否将阿壮99年的环法冠军降级
阿壮是睾丸癌?
那黄色手环就代表睾丸癌?
WADA的规定：如果只有一份尿样被保存下来，那只能是匿名的，如果科学实验要用就必须运动员同意
以下是引用559在2005-8-26 18:06:13的发言： 考，如果真的这样，阿壮别退役了，明年再来个冠军给大家瞧瞧
还是让他退役吧，至少在有生之年再给JAN次机会吧
虽然我认识JAN明年还是没有机会
现在还是没有定论吗？ 
| 欢迎光临 单车之家-BikeHome.net (http://bbs.bikehome.net/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.2 |