单车之家-BikeHome.net

标题: 【主旨: 幫繁體中文投票】 [打印本页]

作者: mauricze 时间: 2007-6-22 21:07
标题: 【主旨: 幫繁體中文投票】
主旨: 幫繁體中文投票

聯合國決定於2008廢除繁體中文. 若成了
想想我們老祖先千年留給我們的姓名也將因簡體而變形,
中華文化遺產的摧毀不僅發生在中國, 也行將全世界,
可能以後要讀繁體字只能在日本, 這多諷刺呀 !
想了就可怕,請將這封信用力寄出去 .

下面網站是為了反對這項決定

大家去投票吧謝謝
投票步驟:
1.點下方網頁進入
2.滑動轉軸到下方一點的地方,點 Sign the petition
3.填寫資料
4.送出即成
5.轉寄給其他朋友

http://www.gopetition.com/region/237/8314.html

現在全球才479 多人投反對票….要加油 !!!!

作者: 小刀飞快 时间: 2007-6-22 21:14
白痴联合国，他们懂什么叫文明吗。活见鬼了

作者: 猪唐唐912 时间: 2007-6-22 21:29
假的吧

作者: mauricze 时间: 2007-6-22 21:46
真的，我已经sign了

作者: alonefire 时间: 2007-6-22 21:46
一看就是假的.

使用什么文字和联合国没有关系。

又不是秦始皇

作者: idler1984 时间: 2007-6-22 21:51
就算联合国废掉了，全世界不还在用吗

作者: hawaii 时间: 2007-6-22 21:55
那个网页打开速度太慢类~

叫那个服务器换个运营商~

作者: glorysky 时间: 2007-6-22 21:55

它说禁止就禁止啊，不是天天说,要让世界和平嘛,世界还不是一样,天天出事情...那些个家伙,鸟事不干,天天就知道弄这些,总之一句话,没事找抽,,,,在怎么说,它能禁止一种文字么,简直是放屁.......让那些家伙回去吃猪肉去吧..................

作者: mauricze 时间: 2007-6-22 22:03

引用第4楼alonefire于2007-06-22 21:46发表的:
一看就是假的.
使用什么文字和联合国没有关系。

又不是秦始皇

瞧一瞧你的签名，还振兴中华呢

联合国是要unify中文，不是为了废除繁体中文
具体的自己看请愿者的阐述吧

Description/History:
The Chinese language has many dialects spoken yet Mandarin has always been the official language.

In Mandarin, there are two present types of writings: Traditional and Simplified Chinese characters. Traditional Chinese has been the official form of writing for thousands of years. And from it, the Simplified form was born.

In recent decades, China's effort in trying to make Chinese easier for both her youth and foreigners resulted in this push of Simplified Chinese. However, at the same time, Traditional Chinese is still studied and widely recognized.

The purpose of Simplified Chinese was meant for an easier reading (with less characters) and less pen-strokes in writing characters. It is the attempt of making Chinese more phonetic rather than having many words pronounced the same.

The two forms of Chinese have always co-existed peacefully for many years. The importance of Traditional Chinese lies in the fact that each character represents a very specific meaning. This is of extreme importance because it allows the reader to understand a written word even without the word being in context.

Simplified Chinese, although convenient, fails to incorporate meaning into its characters. Many words of same phonetic sounds are replaced by a single character that possesses the same sound but lacks in meaning. The major downfall of Simplified Chinese is that it lacks meaning. Currently, historical texts are in Traditional Chinese, (simply because one can read and understand based on the author's choice of words) however, if Traditional Chinese is to be replaced by Simplified Chinese, one would not be able to understand these texts/writings because words have lost their meanings, they simply represent a way of pronouncing the texts. As time progresses, this would result in the loss of history and culture.

UN's action to "unify" the Chinese characters and recognize ONLY Simplified Chinese will have devastating impact upon the Chinese language, culture, history. Internationally, Traditional Chinese would be forgotten and neglected, it would only be a matter of time before Traditional Chinese becomes the next "Latin". (the dead language) Along with this loss of language, would be a culture and history lost forever.

Although Simplified Chinese is an easier way to learn Chinese, but it should not be the only form of Chinese written language. It should be a convenience, not an absolute. By allowing it to become the "official" writing, the Chinese language would be in regression.

------------------

Example of Simplified VS Traditional (provided by a fellow supporter)

The word Noodle in Chinese
Traditional: 麵 = 麥 + 面 (wheat + surface)
Simplified: 面 (surface/face/noodle)
*meaning in brackets

The Traditional form has two parts which helps to identify it as noodles. Simplified character only provides the pronouciation so the reader would be unable to determine the meaning without it's context.

-------------------

The above has been confirmed that the UN never used both Chinese forms. IN FACT, Traditional Chinese does not even exist in the UN anymore (except prior to early 1970's).

In truth, I am uncertain what will become of this petition. After all, it is a few decades late. Although, what saddens me, is the fact that Traditional Chinese has already lost its ground.

People signed this petition to fight against Traditional Chinese being abolished. YET, now that we know it's a fact, why should we not fight harder.

Some have claimed this to be a hoax. Others have supported and sent emails. I personally thank everyone of you who took time to come here regardless of your positions.
Petition:
We, the undersigned, are appalled by the abolishment of Traditional Chinese in UN documents. This is an act of annihilation of the culture and history of the Chinese people.

Both Traditional and Simplified Chinese are of extreme significance and should be recognized equally on the international level and by UN.
Sign the petition

The Say NO to United Nations' abolishment of Traditional Chinese in 2008 petition to United Nations Secretary-General : Ban Ki-moon was written by Jennifer Ping and is hosted free of charge at GoPetition.com.

作者: 小白 时间: 2007-6-22 22:20
虽然不会写，但看是没什么大问题的，以后让小孩也认得就行了，以后的事~~谁说的准呢

作者: hawaii 时间: 2007-6-22 22:23
其实我从小到大写文章都是用繁体的~

作者: jingo 时间: 2007-6-22 22:28

应该不会吧？要不以后练书法就全用简体字？那个有点难看啊。。。

上次电视正好看到我的姓“金”就是从“劉”姓涎生出来的，所以我还是去投一票好了

欢迎光临单车之家-BikeHome.net (http://bbs.bikehome.net/)